Skip to content

revert test #510

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
jrosental wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

revert test #510

jrosental wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@jrosental
Copy link
Contributor

@jrosental jrosental commented Jan 28, 2026 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Minor internal cleanup to code comments.

Note: This release contains no user-facing changes or improvements.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

A trailing period was removed from a comment line in the T interface declaration within the testing package. This is a purely cosmetic documentation change with no functional impact on code behavior or API surface.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Comment Formatting
pkg/test/testing_t.go		 Removed trailing period from T interface comment

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Poem

🐰 A period fell from the comment line,
Like dewdrops from a morning vine,
Small as it is, the fix is fine,
Polish and care in code align! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'revert test' is vague and does not clearly indicate what specific change or revert is being performed. It lacks specificity about which test is being reverted and why. Provide a more descriptive title that specifies what test is being reverted and the reason, such as 'Revert changes to test upload coverage flow' or similar.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 28, 2026

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@alexeykazakov alexeykazakov alexeykazakov approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jrosental @alexeykazakov